Plans

Technical support options for academic journals

Different ways to work together depending on your journal's stage of development and technical needs.

JournalsHQ provides technical support for academic journals at different stages: from initial OJS implementation to improvements in configuration, technical processes and stability.

The focus is clear: solving the technical side so the editorial team can concentrate on its work.

Technical support for one journal

For an academic journal that needs an orderly, maintainable OJS implementation prepared for real editorial operation.

OJS 3.5 deployment or review on managed editorial infrastructure.
Initial journal structure, sections, main roles and core configuration.
Basic Bootstrap-compatible OJS theme or JournalsHQ base theme when available.
Technical support for DOI/Crossref and metadata configuration where applicable to the scope.
Transactional email delivery configuration for OJS notifications, with real delivery testing.
SSL, basic security review and initial operational checks.
Support for editorial workflow configuration without replacing the journal team's editorial decisions.

JournalsHQ configures the technical foundation; editorial policy, content, author guidelines, peer review and academic workload remain the responsibility of the editorial team.

A clear technical foundation for operating an OJS journal with stability and support.

Request information

Technical support for multiple journals

For institutions, faculties or teams managing several journals and needing shared, consistent and scalable managed editorial infrastructure.

OJS 3.5 environment prepared to operate several journals from a common technical base.
Standardized journal configuration, roles, editorial structure and operational settings.
Consistent application of base theme, minimal visual identity and OJS-compatible adjustments.
Technical support for DOI/Crossref, metadata and publication workflows according to each journal's policy.
Managed transactional email delivery for OJS notifications to authors, reviewers, editors and system users.
SSL, basic security controls, operational checks and consistency criteria across journals.
Clear separation between technical platform administration and multi-journal editorial management.

This plan helps reduce scattered configurations across journals and makes technical support, diagnosis and gradual growth easier.

Organized editorial infrastructure for managing several publications under common criteria.

Discuss options

Migration and technical reorganization

For journals already operating in OJS or other platforms that need diagnosis, scoped migration, technical correction or orderly implementation.

Diagnosis of the current OJS state, structure, plugins, theme, email, DOI and basic operation.
Migration or implementation defined by scope, with prior review of risks and limitations.
Correction of journal structure, sections, roles, editorial settings and critical parameters.
Metadata and DOI/Crossref review where applicable, without promising large historic cleanup outside the agreed scope.
Configuration or replacement of fragile OJS email setup with managed transactional delivery when viable.
SSL, basic security review and checks to leave the journal in operational condition.

The evaluation separates technical work from editorial responsibility: JournalsHQ corrects the platform, while the journal team validates content, editorial decisions and academic priorities.

Each case is reviewed specifically according to the journal's real current state.

Request evaluation

Reliable editorial email delivery

OJS relies heavily on email for password resets, reviewer invitations, author notifications, editorial communication and system notices.

JournalsHQ configures a managed transactional SMTP service for OJS instead of relying on personal Gmail accounts, app passwords or fragile organization SMTP accounts. When the client domain allows it, this includes authenticated sender or domain setup and SPF, DKIM and DMARC alignment.

Editorial infrastructure with operational security

In addition to setting up OJS, JournalsHQ applies technical criteria focused on stability, protection, and operational continuity. The difference is not only installing the platform, but leaving it prepared to operate with basic controls, backups, and monitoring.

Baseline OJS security

An OJS journal does not only need to be published: it also needs protection against configuration mistakes, automated access attempts, and accidental exposure of sensitive files.

JournalsHQ applies a baseline security approach that includes blocking installer access after provisioning, keeping the files directory outside public web access, protecting sensitive files, reviewing permissions, and applying basic controls against suspicious access.

This reduces common risks in poorly maintained OJS installations, such as exposed installers, public configuration files, or editorial file directories placed inside the public web root.

Monitoring and technical alerts

A journal's operation does not end when the website loads correctly. The associated services — web server, PHP, database, SSL certificates, backups, and critical routes — need periodic checks.

JournalsHQ includes operational checks for OJS installations, including server availability, certificate validity, accidental installer exposure, and recent backup availability.

When a critical condition is detected, the system can generate technical alerts to speed up response and reduce downtime.

Backups and recovery readiness

Academic journals contain years of editorial work, files, metadata, users, reviews, and published issues. For that reason, backups cannot be treated as a secondary detail.

JournalsHQ considers periodic backups of critical platform components, including application files, data directories, relevant configuration files, and databases.

The goal is to keep a technical foundation prepared for recovery after failures, migrations, or incidents, instead of depending only on improvised manual actions.

Technical separation per journal

Each OJS installation is organized with a clear separation between code, editorial files, configuration, domain, and database. This makes maintenance, technical auditing, and troubleshooting easier.

This architecture avoids unnecessarily mixing data from different journals and allows consistent security, permissions, backup, and operational support criteria to be applied.

Every journal has a different starting point.

If the right option is not yet clear, an initial review can help define the best technical path.

Request technical support